A meta-analysis examining the moderating effects of educational level and subject area on CSCL effectiveness
Số trang: 20
Loại file: pdf
Dung lượng: 337.92 KB
Lượt xem: 3
Lượt tải: 0
Xem trước 2 trang đầu tiên của tài liệu này:
Thông tin tài liệu:
The positive effects of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) on students’ learning outcomes and processes have been widely reported in individual empirical studies and meta-analyses. More specifically, in the meta-analysis by Chen, Wang, Kirschner, and Tsai (2018), the effects were found to be attributed to the three main elements of CSCL including collaborative learning, computer use, extra learning environments/tools or extra supporting strategies. This study extends that meta-analysis by examining the moderating effects of educational level and subject area on the effectiveness of CSCL. The moderating effects of educational level were found not to be significant on the effectiveness of collaborative learning, computer use, extra learning environments or tools, or extra supporting strategies with respect to student knowledge achievement. Subject area, on the other hand, was found to be a significant moderator for the effectiveness of extra learning environments or tools and extra supporting strategies.
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
A meta-analysis examining the moderating effects of educational level and subject area on CSCL effectiveness
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
A meta-analysis examining the moderating effects of educational level and subject area on CSCL effectiveness
Tìm kiếm theo từ khóa liên quan:
Computer-supported collaborative learning Meta-analysis Moderator effects Educational level Subject areaGợi ý tài liệu liên quan:
-
11 trang 31 0 0
-
10 trang 22 0 0
-
Patients with Parkinson's disease predict a lower incidence of colorectal cancer
8 trang 21 0 0 -
10 trang 19 0 0
-
15 trang 18 0 0
-
Construction and case study of a novel lung cancer risk index
10 trang 17 0 0 -
11 trang 17 0 0
-
14 trang 17 0 0
-
14 trang 16 0 0
-
CT Scans and Cancer Risks: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis
13 trang 16 0 0