High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Số trang: 10
Loại file: pdf
Dung lượng: 1.46 MB
Lượt xem: 9
Lượt tải: 0
Xem trước 2 trang đầu tiên của tài liệu này:
Thông tin tài liệu:
Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common and life-threatening medical emergency in patients admitted to the hospital. Currently, there is a lack of large-scale evidence on the use of high-flow nasal cannulas (HFNC) in patients with ARF. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated whether there were differences between HFNC therapy and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) for treating patients with ARF.
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Tìm kiếm theo từ khóa liên quan:
BMC Pulmonary Medicine High-flow nasal cannula Acute respiratory failure Systematic review Meta-analysisGợi ý tài liệu liên quan:
-
19 trang 250 0 0
-
Differences between physician and patient preferences for cancer treatments: A systematic review
13 trang 169 0 0 -
16 trang 32 0 0
-
Towards a sustainable campus landscape in Vietnam: A systematic review of the literature
12 trang 30 0 0 -
11 trang 29 0 0
-
10 trang 21 0 0
-
Patients with Parkinson's disease predict a lower incidence of colorectal cancer
8 trang 20 0 0 -
Ebook Cloud logistics - Reference architecture design: Part 2
353 trang 20 0 0 -
10 trang 19 0 0
-
7 trang 19 0 0