Lecture Managerial economics - Chapter 5: Oligopoly
Số trang: 38
Loại file: pdf
Dung lượng: 1.36 MB
Lượt xem: 22
Lượt tải: 0
Xem trước 4 trang đầu tiên của tài liệu này:
Thông tin tài liệu:
We’ve modeled 2 ends of the market structure: Competitive market and monopoly. Now we look at cases in between ( N = small ). Oligopoly is market or industry dominated by a small number of firms, whose decisions (price, output, marketing) are interdependent. In chapter 5, we will discuss this problem.
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
Lecture Managerial economics - Chapter 5: Oligopoly Week 5 Oligopoly1 Introduction We’ve modeled 2 ends of the market structure • Competitive market ( N = ∞ ) • Monopoly ( N = 1) Now we look at cases in between ( N = small ) Oligopoly: Market or industry dominated by a small number of firms, whose decisions (price, output, marketing) are interdependent. • More than 1 firm, but industry is highly concentrated. • Examples – Coke vs Pepsi – Boeing vs Airbus – Auto Industry2 Concentration Concentration ratio: One measure of industry concentration. CR4=% of Total Industry Sales accounted for by the four largest firms CR20=% of Total Industry Sales accounted for by the twenty largest firms The higher the CR, the greater the degree of market power by a small number of firms. Benchmarks: Effective Monopoly: CR1 > 90% (only 2-3% of GDP) Effectively Competitive: CR4 < 40% (top four firms have individual markets shares averaging less than 10%). 75% of GDP Loose Oligopoly: 40% < CR4 < 60% (monopolistic competition) 12% of GDP Tight Oligopoly: CR4 > 60% (10% of GDP)3 Concentration and Prices Department of Justice is concerned with how mergers affect consumers because of the following possible outcome: Ceteris paribus, the higher the concentration the higher the prices and the higher the profits. High prices could be because of collusion or just because of reduced competition. The fewer the firms, the less the intense, cutthroat competition, and the more likely that prices will be high. The higher the entry barriers, the higher the expected prices. More formally, we have P = f (Cost, Demand, and Seller Concentration).4 Game Theory Game theory is a way to model strategic interactions • Developed by John Nash, watch “Beautiful Mind” The Prisoners’ Dilemma Game: A Classic Example • Two prisoners suspected of committing a crime are in custody • They are put into 2 separate interrogation rooms (no communication between prisoners) • If they both keep silence, then both will only get 1 year time in jail. • If both confess, they will both get 3 years. • If A confesses and B keeps silence, A gets out of jail and B gets 5 years and vice versa. What will be the outcome?5 The Prisoners’ Dilemma Game Convention rules • 2 players, 2 actions : Draw a 2 by 2 matrix • Write first player’s actions (confess / silence) in left of matrix (above & below) • Write second player’s actions (confess / silence) on top (left & right) • Write the payoffs in each cell. First player’s payoff first.6 What is the Equilibrium Outcome? Equilibrium: No one has incentive to move from the outcome • (confess, confess) : If any deviates, he will get 5 years instead of 3 years. • The optimal outcome (silence, silence) is not an equilibrium. Principle : Equilibrium outcome is not always optimal.7 Dominant Strategies No matter what Prisoner 2 chooses, Prisoner 1 always finds it better to confess • Confessing is also always Prisoner 2’s best strategy … try it yourself Dominant Strategy: an action that is best no matter what strategy a rival adopts • Prisoner 1’s dominant strategy is to confess • Prisoner 2’s dominant strategy is also to confess • Equilibrium is (confess, confess). • Lesson: if you have a dominant strategy, always play it Not all games have dominant strategy. • it is not always the case that a player has a dominant strategy • it is not always the case that a game has any dominant strategies8 Perspective on Game Theory The basic question • if my rivals act to maximize their objective, how should I take their behavior into account when making my own decisions? Applications • Any situation where there are a small number (2, 3, 4) of players with small number of actions –Business Strategy » OPEC game: How much to produce? –Sports Game » In football, Pass or Run? » In baseball, Throw a Strike or Ball?9 OPEC Game Suppose OPEC has 12 members (Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela). • They all produce identical oil. • Each county decides how many barrels to produce • Price will be determined by P = $(1400 – Total Quantity). –If total number of barrels > 1400, then P = 0. • Unit cost for each country = Qi ...
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
Lecture Managerial economics - Chapter 5: Oligopoly Week 5 Oligopoly1 Introduction We’ve modeled 2 ends of the market structure • Competitive market ( N = ∞ ) • Monopoly ( N = 1) Now we look at cases in between ( N = small ) Oligopoly: Market or industry dominated by a small number of firms, whose decisions (price, output, marketing) are interdependent. • More than 1 firm, but industry is highly concentrated. • Examples – Coke vs Pepsi – Boeing vs Airbus – Auto Industry2 Concentration Concentration ratio: One measure of industry concentration. CR4=% of Total Industry Sales accounted for by the four largest firms CR20=% of Total Industry Sales accounted for by the twenty largest firms The higher the CR, the greater the degree of market power by a small number of firms. Benchmarks: Effective Monopoly: CR1 > 90% (only 2-3% of GDP) Effectively Competitive: CR4 < 40% (top four firms have individual markets shares averaging less than 10%). 75% of GDP Loose Oligopoly: 40% < CR4 < 60% (monopolistic competition) 12% of GDP Tight Oligopoly: CR4 > 60% (10% of GDP)3 Concentration and Prices Department of Justice is concerned with how mergers affect consumers because of the following possible outcome: Ceteris paribus, the higher the concentration the higher the prices and the higher the profits. High prices could be because of collusion or just because of reduced competition. The fewer the firms, the less the intense, cutthroat competition, and the more likely that prices will be high. The higher the entry barriers, the higher the expected prices. More formally, we have P = f (Cost, Demand, and Seller Concentration).4 Game Theory Game theory is a way to model strategic interactions • Developed by John Nash, watch “Beautiful Mind” The Prisoners’ Dilemma Game: A Classic Example • Two prisoners suspected of committing a crime are in custody • They are put into 2 separate interrogation rooms (no communication between prisoners) • If they both keep silence, then both will only get 1 year time in jail. • If both confess, they will both get 3 years. • If A confesses and B keeps silence, A gets out of jail and B gets 5 years and vice versa. What will be the outcome?5 The Prisoners’ Dilemma Game Convention rules • 2 players, 2 actions : Draw a 2 by 2 matrix • Write first player’s actions (confess / silence) in left of matrix (above & below) • Write second player’s actions (confess / silence) on top (left & right) • Write the payoffs in each cell. First player’s payoff first.6 What is the Equilibrium Outcome? Equilibrium: No one has incentive to move from the outcome • (confess, confess) : If any deviates, he will get 5 years instead of 3 years. • The optimal outcome (silence, silence) is not an equilibrium. Principle : Equilibrium outcome is not always optimal.7 Dominant Strategies No matter what Prisoner 2 chooses, Prisoner 1 always finds it better to confess • Confessing is also always Prisoner 2’s best strategy … try it yourself Dominant Strategy: an action that is best no matter what strategy a rival adopts • Prisoner 1’s dominant strategy is to confess • Prisoner 2’s dominant strategy is also to confess • Equilibrium is (confess, confess). • Lesson: if you have a dominant strategy, always play it Not all games have dominant strategy. • it is not always the case that a player has a dominant strategy • it is not always the case that a game has any dominant strategies8 Perspective on Game Theory The basic question • if my rivals act to maximize their objective, how should I take their behavior into account when making my own decisions? Applications • Any situation where there are a small number (2, 3, 4) of players with small number of actions –Business Strategy » OPEC game: How much to produce? –Sports Game » In football, Pass or Run? » In baseball, Throw a Strike or Ball?9 OPEC Game Suppose OPEC has 12 members (Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela). • They all produce identical oil. • Each county decides how many barrels to produce • Price will be determined by P = $(1400 – Total Quantity). –If total number of barrels > 1400, then P = 0. • Unit cost for each country = Qi ...
Tìm kiếm theo từ khóa liên quan:
Managerial economics Lecture Managerial economics Competitive market Dominant Strategies Perspective on Game TheoryGợi ý tài liệu liên quan:
-
Ebook Managerial economics (Seventh edition): Part 2
520 trang 34 0 0 -
Ebook Managerial economics - EIILM Varsity
305 trang 30 0 0 -
Ebook Managerial economics: Theory and practice - Part 2
380 trang 25 0 0 -
Ebook Managerial economics: Part 1 - Ashwani Panesar
144 trang 24 0 0 -
138 trang 21 0 0
-
Ebook Managerial economics (Seventh edition): Part 1
304 trang 21 0 0 -
Ebook Managerial economics: Part 2 - Ashwani Panesar
92 trang 20 0 0 -
Ebook Managerial economics: A mathematical approach - Part 1
264 trang 20 0 0 -
Ebook Managerial economics: Theory and practice - Part 1
375 trang 19 0 0 -
Ebook Managerial economics: A mathematical approach - Part 2
344 trang 17 0 0