Telecommuting: will it change the world? Telecommuting will have major effects in the worlds of work
Số trang: 9
Loại file: pdf
Dung lượng: 29.64 KB
Lượt xem: 6
Lượt tải: 0
Xem trước 2 trang đầu tiên của tài liệu này:
Thông tin tài liệu:
Telecommuting: will it change the world? Telecommuting will have major effects in the worlds of work and family life. However, its biggest effect will be in the area of individual freedom, responsibility, and time management. Work and workplaces will alter dramatically. Offices may become smaller, as fewer desks are needed. There will be greater need for highbandwidth connections to link the office and the home, and even homes to other homes, as other employees and supervisors also begin working at home. Hours spent commuting, traffic jams, and fights for parking should diminish, as workers make fewer journeys or work staggered...
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
Telecommuting: will it change the world? Telecommuting will have major effects in the worlds of work Telecommuting: will it change the world? Telecommuting will have major effects in the worlds of work andfamily life. However, its biggest effect will be in the area of individualfreedom, responsibility, and time management. Work and workplaces will alter dramatically. Offices may becomesmaller, as fewer desks are needed. There will be greater need for high-bandwidth connections to link the office and the home, and even homes toother homes, as other employees and supervisors also begin working at home.Hours spent commuting, traffic jams, and fights for parking should diminish,as workers make fewer journeys or work staggered hours. Family life will also change. Workers, both husbands and wives, canarrange their work around family commitments such as taking children toschool, cooking, leisure activities, etc. However, households will also have toset aside areas for work - particularly if both spouses are telecommuting. However, although the ideas of more time at home and less timetraveling are attractive, there are some drawbacks to telecommuting. Peoplemay feel unable to escape their work, and may even work longer or moreunsocial hours. The quality of work may suffer because of the reduced face-to-face interaction with other employees. There may be delays if otherworkers are not immediately available. Telecommuters may feel isolated orunmotivated, or insecure about decisions. A major change will be in the waypeople think about work as a place or an institution. Instead, they will focuson the task or product. Workers may feel less loyal to a company and moreinclined to change jobs or work part-time or on contract. In conclusion, the effects are difficult to predict because they dependon the extent to which telecommuting becomes popular. However,telecommuting could be the start of a major societal shift, possibly as big asthe Industrial Revolution which created our present ideas of work. Should rich countries help poorer ones? Today, the world is becoming more and more closely linked. Trade hasincreased and the movement of people between countries is greater than everbefore. However, billions of people still live in poverty, and in many places,the gap between rich and poor is widening. This essay will look at thearguments for and against helping poor countries. There are many reasons for helping poor countries. First of all, thereare humanitarian reasons. Like individuals who give to charity, manycountries feel it is their religious, social, or moral duty to help people in othercountries who are suffering from famine, drought, war, or disease. However,many rich countries also donate money for political or diplomatic reasons.They want to maintain a relationship of dependency with the recipient, orsimply to influence the government and direction of the country. A furtherreason why many countries help poorer ones is for economic reasons. Thedonors may want to control the supply of commodities such as oil, water, orwheat. Alternatively, the richer country may want to ensure markets for theirown products, whether these are planes, computers or shoes. However, aid is not necessarily the best way to help a country. For onething, billions of dollars of aid often goes missing, into corrupt governmentsor inefficient administration. A second point is that many foreign aid projectsare unsuitable for the target country. Many agencies build huge dams orindustrial projects that fail after a few years or that do not involve the localpeople. Furthermore, much aid returns to the donor. This can be in the form ofexpensive specialized equipment and experts from the donor country. There are many other ways we can help poor countries. Opening uptrade barriers, so that poor countries can sell their goods is one way. Anotheris to remove subsidies so that imported goods from poorer countries cancompete fairly. A third method is to forgive debts. Many poor countries havehuge interest repayments on old loans. The needs of the poorer countries may seem obvious. However,although our humanity makes us want to help eliminate poverty and suffering,we must examine the real needs of poor countries and implement solutionsthat will benefit both them and us. Who learns faster - children or adults? Small children seem to learn very quickly, while adults sometimesappear to lose the ability to pick up new subject such as languages, music,games, or computer programs. In this essay, I will discuss whether children oradults make the best learners. It is undoubtedly true that children seem to learn very quickly. In just afew years, they can learn how to play a musical instrument, speak one or eventwo new languages, and deal with many subjects at school. They even havetime for sports and hobbies, and become experts in their favorite pastimes.However, how much of this is social pressure and how much is genetic? I amconvinced that while childrens brains have a natural ability to absorb newinformation as part of their developmental growth, much of their achievementis because of social pressure. Schools force them to take many subjects.Parents force them to practice new sports or to learn music. Even theirplaymates force them to become better at computer games or to read HarryPotter novels faster. In summary, children may enjoy learning, but theirenvironment also is a big motivating factor. Adults on the other hand are supposed to be poor learners. However, Idisagree with people who say that adults cannot learn quickly. Adults havemany skills that compensate for the decline in the ability of the brain to graspand remember new material. They can organize their learning by se ...
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
Telecommuting: will it change the world? Telecommuting will have major effects in the worlds of work Telecommuting: will it change the world? Telecommuting will have major effects in the worlds of work andfamily life. However, its biggest effect will be in the area of individualfreedom, responsibility, and time management. Work and workplaces will alter dramatically. Offices may becomesmaller, as fewer desks are needed. There will be greater need for high-bandwidth connections to link the office and the home, and even homes toother homes, as other employees and supervisors also begin working at home.Hours spent commuting, traffic jams, and fights for parking should diminish,as workers make fewer journeys or work staggered hours. Family life will also change. Workers, both husbands and wives, canarrange their work around family commitments such as taking children toschool, cooking, leisure activities, etc. However, households will also have toset aside areas for work - particularly if both spouses are telecommuting. However, although the ideas of more time at home and less timetraveling are attractive, there are some drawbacks to telecommuting. Peoplemay feel unable to escape their work, and may even work longer or moreunsocial hours. The quality of work may suffer because of the reduced face-to-face interaction with other employees. There may be delays if otherworkers are not immediately available. Telecommuters may feel isolated orunmotivated, or insecure about decisions. A major change will be in the waypeople think about work as a place or an institution. Instead, they will focuson the task or product. Workers may feel less loyal to a company and moreinclined to change jobs or work part-time or on contract. In conclusion, the effects are difficult to predict because they dependon the extent to which telecommuting becomes popular. However,telecommuting could be the start of a major societal shift, possibly as big asthe Industrial Revolution which created our present ideas of work. Should rich countries help poorer ones? Today, the world is becoming more and more closely linked. Trade hasincreased and the movement of people between countries is greater than everbefore. However, billions of people still live in poverty, and in many places,the gap between rich and poor is widening. This essay will look at thearguments for and against helping poor countries. There are many reasons for helping poor countries. First of all, thereare humanitarian reasons. Like individuals who give to charity, manycountries feel it is their religious, social, or moral duty to help people in othercountries who are suffering from famine, drought, war, or disease. However,many rich countries also donate money for political or diplomatic reasons.They want to maintain a relationship of dependency with the recipient, orsimply to influence the government and direction of the country. A furtherreason why many countries help poorer ones is for economic reasons. Thedonors may want to control the supply of commodities such as oil, water, orwheat. Alternatively, the richer country may want to ensure markets for theirown products, whether these are planes, computers or shoes. However, aid is not necessarily the best way to help a country. For onething, billions of dollars of aid often goes missing, into corrupt governmentsor inefficient administration. A second point is that many foreign aid projectsare unsuitable for the target country. Many agencies build huge dams orindustrial projects that fail after a few years or that do not involve the localpeople. Furthermore, much aid returns to the donor. This can be in the form ofexpensive specialized equipment and experts from the donor country. There are many other ways we can help poor countries. Opening uptrade barriers, so that poor countries can sell their goods is one way. Anotheris to remove subsidies so that imported goods from poorer countries cancompete fairly. A third method is to forgive debts. Many poor countries havehuge interest repayments on old loans. The needs of the poorer countries may seem obvious. However,although our humanity makes us want to help eliminate poverty and suffering,we must examine the real needs of poor countries and implement solutionsthat will benefit both them and us. Who learns faster - children or adults? Small children seem to learn very quickly, while adults sometimesappear to lose the ability to pick up new subject such as languages, music,games, or computer programs. In this essay, I will discuss whether children oradults make the best learners. It is undoubtedly true that children seem to learn very quickly. In just afew years, they can learn how to play a musical instrument, speak one or eventwo new languages, and deal with many subjects at school. They even havetime for sports and hobbies, and become experts in their favorite pastimes.However, how much of this is social pressure and how much is genetic? I amconvinced that while childrens brains have a natural ability to absorb newinformation as part of their developmental growth, much of their achievementis because of social pressure. Schools force them to take many subjects.Parents force them to practice new sports or to learn music. Even theirplaymates force them to become better at computer games or to read HarryPotter novels faster. In summary, children may enjoy learning, but theirenvironment also is a big motivating factor. Adults on the other hand are supposed to be poor learners. However, Idisagree with people who say that adults cannot learn quickly. Adults havemany skills that compensate for the decline in the ability of the brain to graspand remember new material. They can organize their learning by se ...
Gợi ý tài liệu liên quan:
-
Đề cương chi tiết học phần Trí tuệ nhân tạo
12 trang 438 0 0 -
Đề cương chi tiết học phần Vi xử lý
12 trang 296 0 0 -
79 trang 229 0 0
-
Đồ án: Kỹ thuật xử lý ảnh sử dụng biến đổi Wavelet
41 trang 219 0 0 -
Luận văn Thạc sĩ Kỹ thuật: Ứng dụng Blockchain trong bảo mật IoT
90 trang 191 1 0 -
Đề cương chi tiết học phần Thực tập Kỹ thuật truyền hình
16 trang 155 0 0 -
Đồ án: Thiết kế bộ điều khiển luật PID điều khiển động cơ DC
94 trang 151 0 0 -
65 trang 145 0 0
-
Đề cương chi tiết học phần Vi điều khiển
15 trang 140 0 0 -
Đồ án: Cấu tạo và nguyên lý hoạt động của màn hình LCD monitor
80 trang 138 0 0