Báo cáo: CÁC CHI TIÊU AVERAGE CỦA SINH VIÊN VÀ TRỢ CẤP CỦA CHÍNH PHỦ

Thay vì in sách cho học sinh, có thể FMT đăng các sách điện tử của tất cả các sách giáo khoa và phác thảo trong học kỳ vào trang web của giảng viên. Do sinh viên FMT tìm thấy phương pháp này nhiều hơn
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
Báo cáo: CÁC CHI TIÊU AVERAGE CỦA SINH VIÊN VÀ TRỢ CẤP CỦA CHÍNH PHỦ Statistics ProjectTHE AVERAGE SPENDINGOF STUDENTS AND THEGOVERNMENT’S SUBSIDYTutor Tran Kim AnhGroup name BH GROUPGroup member Nguyen Thi Hong Nhung Pham Thi Quynh Trang Le Phuong Linh Le Thi Hong Nhung Nguyen Thi Thuy Nhi Khuong Ninh Trang Nguyen Thi Hoa Ha Thi Hue Tran Thi Thao Do Thi Kim Hue Outline• Introduction• Research Methodology• Descriptive Results and Findings• Results and findings of hypothesis test• Project Evaluation• Conclusions and RecommendationsINTRODUCTION • Reason for research: The method FMT using to distribute the textbooks and outlines to students is not as effective as we expected. • Objective: Instead of printing books for students , FMT can post the e-books of all textbooks and outlines in the semester into the faculty’s websiteINTRODUCTION (cont) • Research question: • Do FMT students find this method more convenient? • Is this method work effective if we applied it? • For the FMT students who didn’t buy books from FMT, will this new way bring the benefits to them?METHODOLOGY 1. Population 425 FMT students course 08 374 FMT students course 09 799 students 2. Questionnaire 5 Y/N questionsMETHODOLOGY (cont) 3. Sample size and sampling method n = 60 • Random sampling method using Excel =INT(RAND()*799) • Delivering questionnaireMETHODOLOGY (cont) 4. Data processing Excel software was used to support the job and calculate the complex statistics 5. Significant level We chose α =5%.DESCRITIVE RESULTSand FindingsDescriptive Results AND FINDINGS Figure 1: The amount of money students have each month 29% 24% 30 20% 18% 20 3% 10 6% 0 00 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 ,0 ,0 0,0 0, 0, 0, 00 00 50 00 50 50 1,0 2,5 1, 2, 2, < 0- 0- 0- 0- > 00 00 00 00 0, 0, 0, 0, 50 00 50 00 1, 1, 2,DESCRITIVE RESULTS AND FINDINGS(cont) 25% 24% 24% 20% 4% 3%DESCRITIVE RESULTS AND FINDINGS(cont) Firgure 3: The percentage of students running out of money 39% Yes 61% NoDESCRITIVE RESULTS AND FINDINGS(cont) 25% 24% 24% 20% 4% 3%HYPOTHESIS TEST • Z-test for σ unknown, normal or not normal population, sample size n ≥ 30 • Approximation Method for grouped data:HYPOTHESIS TEST (cont)HYPOTHESIS TEST (cont) • Calculating the mean and standard variance of sampleHYPOTHESIS TEST (cont) Using z-test: • H0: µ = 860,000 • Ha: µ > 860,000 • Significant level: α = 0.05 • Decision rule: Critical value: z0.05 ≈ 1.645 Reject H0 if z >1.645HYPOTHESIS TEST (cont) • The values of z • z = 3.385 > 1.96, we reject H0 • Conclusion: enough evidence to infer that the average spending of students exceed the government’s subsidyPROJECT EVALUATION 1. Limitation - Unspecific answer 2. Implication - New policy - Financial managementCONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION 1. Conclusion - Government’s subsidy is not enough - Get more from parents 2. Recommendation - Raising subsidy (if possible) - Getting more money from partime job•Thanksforyour listening