báo cáo khoa học: Correction: EGFR and COX-2 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer and the correlation with clinical features

Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Correction: EGFR and COX-2 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer and the correlation with clinical features
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
báo cáo khoa học: " Correction: EGFR and COX-2 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer and the correlation with clinical features"Li et al. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 2011, 30:32http://www.jeccr.com/content/30/1/32 CORRECTION Open AccessCorrection: EGFR and COX-2 protein expression innon-small cell lung cancer and the correlationwith clinical featuresFeng Li1, Yongmei Liu1, Huijiao Chen2, Dianying Liao2, Yali Shen1, Feng Xu1*†, Jin Wang1*†Correction Which should have been: “The positive rate of EGFR protein in NSCLC tumorIn the article [1] there were errors in Tables three, four, cells were 46%, which was significantly higher than itsfive, six and seven. The incorrect values were produced expression in normal lung (p = 0.034) and paracancer-due to typographical errors during translation stage. ous (p = 0.020)”These errors affect neither the published discussion nor Under the heading “ Correlation between EGFRthe conclusions of the paper. However, a few changes to expression and clinical features“ The second sentencethe results section are detailed here. read: “It shows that the difference of EGFR expressionIn the Abstract, under “Results” the first two was only significant between the nodal positive and negative subgroups (56.4% vs.10%, p = 0.04).”sentences read But the passage should have been “The expression of“ The positive rate of EGFR protein in NSCLC tumor EGFR in different subgroups were compared and sum-cells was 46%, which was significantly higher than its marized in Table three. It shows that the difference ofexpression in normal lung (p = 0.0234) and paracancer- EGFR expression was only significant between the nodalous tissues (p = 0.020). EGFR expression was signifi- positive and negative subgroups (56.4% vs. 9.1%, p =cantly higher in nodal positive than in nodal negativepatients (p = 0.04).” 0.006). There is no significant difference between age (60 vs. under 60 ys), gender, adeno- vs. non-adenocarci- But should have been: noma, the differentiation of tumor, and staging.” “The positive rate of EGFR protein in NSCLC tumor This is the correct table three (table 1).cells was 46%, which was significantly higher than its Correct tables four (table 2), five (table 3) and sixexpression in normal lung (p = 0.034) and paracancer- (table 4).ous tissues (p = 0.020). EGFR expression was signifi- Under the heading “Correlation of EGFR and COX-2cantly higher in nodal positive than in nodal negative expression “ The sentence reads: “ As shown in Tablepatients (p = 0.006).” seven, no correlation was found between COX-2 andIn the main “Results” section of the article EGFR protein expression (Χ2 = 0.112, P = 0.555).” ...