![Phân tích tư tưởng của nhân dân qua đoạn thơ: Những người vợ nhớ chồng… Những cuộc đời đã hóa sông núi ta trong Đất nước của Nguyễn Khoa Điềm](https://timtailieu.net/upload/document/136415/phan-tich-tu-tuong-cua-nhan-dan-qua-doan-tho-039-039-nhung-nguoi-vo-nho-chong-nhung-cuoc-doi-da-hoa-song-nui-ta-039-039-trong-dat-nuoc-cua-nguyen-khoa-136415.jpg)
báo cáo khoa học: Individual and setting level predictors of the implementation of a skin cancer prevention program: a multilevel analysis
Số trang: 13
Loại file: pdf
Dung lượng: 777.77 KB
Lượt xem: 7
Lượt tải: 0
Xem trước 2 trang đầu tiên của tài liệu này:
Thông tin tài liệu:
Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Individual and setting level predictors of the implementation of a skin cancer prevention program: a multilevel analysis
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
báo cáo khoa học: " Individual and setting level predictors of the implementation of a skin cancer prevention program: a multilevel analysis"Rabin et al. Implementation Science 2010, 5:40http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/40 Implementation Science Open Access RESEARCH ARTICLEIndividual and setting level predictors of theResearch articleimplementation of a skin cancer preventionprogram: a multilevel analysisBorsika A Rabin*1, Eric Nehl2, Tom Elliott2, Anjali D Deshpande3, Ross C Brownson4,5 and Karen Glanz2,6 Abstract Background: To achieve widespread cancer control, a better understanding is needed of the factors that contribute to successful implementation of effective skin cancer prevention interventions. This study assessed the relative contributions of individual- and setting-level characteristics to implementation of a widely disseminated skin cancer prevention program. Methods: A multilevel analysis was conducted using data from the Pool Cool Diffusion Trial from 2004 and replicated with data from 2005. Implementation of Pool Cool by lifeguards was measured using a composite score (implementation variable, range 0 to 10) that assessed whether the lifeguard performed different components of the intervention. Predictors included lifeguard background characteristics, lifeguard sun protection-related attitudes and behaviors, pool characteristics, and enhanced (i.e., more technical assistance, tailored materials, and incentives are provided) versus basic treatment group. Results: The mean value of the implementation variable was 4 in both years (2004 and 2005; SD = 2 in 2004 and SD = 3 in 2005) indicating a moderate implementation for most lifeguards. Several individual-level (lifeguard characteristics) and setting-level (pool characteristics and treatment group) factors were found to be significantly associated with implementation of Pool Cool by lifeguards. All three lifeguard-level domains (lifeguard background characteristics, lifeguard sun protection-related attitudes and behaviors) and six pool-level predictors (number of weekly pool visitors, intervention intensity, geographic latitude, pool location, sun safety and/or skin cancer prevention programs, and sun safety programs and policies) were included in the final model. The most important predictors of implementation were the number of weekly pool visitors (inverse association) and enhanced treatment group (positive association). That is, pools with fewer weekly visitors and pools in the enhanced treatment group had significantly higher program implementation in both 2004 and 2005. Conclusions: More intense, theory-driven dissemination strategies led to higher levels of implementation of this effective skin cancer prevention program. Issues to be considered by practitioners seeking to implement evidence- based programs in community settings, include taking into account both individual-level and setting-level factors, using active implementation approaches, and assessing local needs to adapt intervention materials.Background mended; however, few of them have been systematicallySkin cancer is the most common and one of the most pre- disseminated and implemented [2]. Furthermore, little isventable forms of cancer in the United States [1]. An known about the barriers and facilitators to the imple-increasing number of effective interventions for the pri- mentation of effective interventions for the primary pre-mary prevention of skin cancer are available and recom- vention of skin cancer [3]. These issues are addressed by the field of implementation research.* Correspondence: borsika@tenshido.net Implementation research studies the processes and fac-1 Cancer Research Network Cancer Communication Research Center, Institute tors that are associated with and lead to the widespreadfor Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, P.O. Box 378066, Denver, CO ...
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
báo cáo khoa học: " Individual and setting level predictors of the implementation of a skin cancer prevention program: a multilevel analysis"Rabin et al. Implementation Science 2010, 5:40http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/40 Implementation Science Open Access RESEARCH ARTICLEIndividual and setting level predictors of theResearch articleimplementation of a skin cancer preventionprogram: a multilevel analysisBorsika A Rabin*1, Eric Nehl2, Tom Elliott2, Anjali D Deshpande3, Ross C Brownson4,5 and Karen Glanz2,6 Abstract Background: To achieve widespread cancer control, a better understanding is needed of the factors that contribute to successful implementation of effective skin cancer prevention interventions. This study assessed the relative contributions of individual- and setting-level characteristics to implementation of a widely disseminated skin cancer prevention program. Methods: A multilevel analysis was conducted using data from the Pool Cool Diffusion Trial from 2004 and replicated with data from 2005. Implementation of Pool Cool by lifeguards was measured using a composite score (implementation variable, range 0 to 10) that assessed whether the lifeguard performed different components of the intervention. Predictors included lifeguard background characteristics, lifeguard sun protection-related attitudes and behaviors, pool characteristics, and enhanced (i.e., more technical assistance, tailored materials, and incentives are provided) versus basic treatment group. Results: The mean value of the implementation variable was 4 in both years (2004 and 2005; SD = 2 in 2004 and SD = 3 in 2005) indicating a moderate implementation for most lifeguards. Several individual-level (lifeguard characteristics) and setting-level (pool characteristics and treatment group) factors were found to be significantly associated with implementation of Pool Cool by lifeguards. All three lifeguard-level domains (lifeguard background characteristics, lifeguard sun protection-related attitudes and behaviors) and six pool-level predictors (number of weekly pool visitors, intervention intensity, geographic latitude, pool location, sun safety and/or skin cancer prevention programs, and sun safety programs and policies) were included in the final model. The most important predictors of implementation were the number of weekly pool visitors (inverse association) and enhanced treatment group (positive association). That is, pools with fewer weekly visitors and pools in the enhanced treatment group had significantly higher program implementation in both 2004 and 2005. Conclusions: More intense, theory-driven dissemination strategies led to higher levels of implementation of this effective skin cancer prevention program. Issues to be considered by practitioners seeking to implement evidence- based programs in community settings, include taking into account both individual-level and setting-level factors, using active implementation approaches, and assessing local needs to adapt intervention materials.Background mended; however, few of them have been systematicallySkin cancer is the most common and one of the most pre- disseminated and implemented [2]. Furthermore, little isventable forms of cancer in the United States [1]. An known about the barriers and facilitators to the imple-increasing number of effective interventions for the pri- mentation of effective interventions for the primary pre-mary prevention of skin cancer are available and recom- vention of skin cancer [3]. These issues are addressed by the field of implementation research.* Correspondence: borsika@tenshido.net Implementation research studies the processes and fac-1 Cancer Research Network Cancer Communication Research Center, Institute tors that are associated with and lead to the widespreadfor Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, P.O. Box 378066, Denver, CO ...
Tìm kiếm theo từ khóa liên quan:
báo cáo khoa học báo cáo y học công trình nghiên cứu về y học tài liệu về y học cách trình bày báo cáoTài liệu liên quan:
-
HƯỚNG DẪN THỰC TẬP VÀ VIẾT BÁO CÁO THỰC TẬP TỐT NGHIỆP
18 trang 361 0 0 -
63 trang 331 0 0
-
13 trang 268 0 0
-
Báo cáo khoa học Bước đầu tìm hiểu văn hóa ẩm thực Trà Vinh
61 trang 255 0 0 -
Hướng dẫn thực tập tốt nghiệp dành cho sinh viên đại học Ngành quản trị kinh doanh
20 trang 247 0 0 -
Tóm tắt luận án tiến sỹ Một số vấn đề tối ưu hóa và nâng cao hiệu quả trong xử lý thông tin hình ảnh
28 trang 225 0 0 -
Đồ án: Nhà máy thủy điện Vĩnh Sơn - Bình Định
54 trang 223 0 0 -
23 trang 216 0 0
-
Đề tài nghiên cứu khoa học và công nghệ cấp trường: Hệ thống giám sát báo trộm cho xe máy
63 trang 214 0 0 -
NGHIÊN CỨU CHỌN TẠO CÁC GIỐNG LÚA CHẤT LƯỢNG CAO CHO VÙNG ĐỒNG BẰNG SÔNG CỬU LONG
9 trang 214 0 0