Danh mục

Báo cáo y học: Acute lung injury outside the ICU: a significant proble

Số trang: 2      Loại file: pdf      Dung lượng: 37.51 KB      Lượt xem: 3      Lượt tải: 0    
Xem trước 2 trang đầu tiên của tài liệu này:

Thông tin tài liệu:

Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học Critical Care giúp cho các bạn có thêm kiến thức về ngành y học đề tài: Acute lung injury outside the ICU: a significant problem...
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
Báo cáo y học: " Acute lung injury outside the ICU: a significant proble" Available online http://ccforum.com/content/11/5/169CommentaryAcute lung injury outside the ICU: a significant problemSimon J Finney and Timothy W EvansDepartment of Critical Care, Imperial College School of Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, SW3 6NP, London, UKCorresponding author: Timothy W Evans, t.evans@rbht.nhs.ukPublished: 26 October 2007 Critical Care 2007, 11:169 (doi:10.1186/cc6128)This article is online at http://ccforum.com/content/11/5/169© 2007 BioMed Central LtdSee related research by Ferguson et al., http://ccforum.com/content/11/5/R96Abstract The incidence of ARDS is influenced by the underlying clinical condition [6]. Moreover, the extent to which theThe incidence of acute lung injury (ALI) is influenced by nature of precipitating condition afflicts the lung directly or indirectlythe underlying clinical condition. The frequency with which ALI is seems to influence lung compliance and recruitment, appear-likely to be encountered by those practicing outside the intensivecare unit (ICU) setting is largely unknown. Data from the paper ances on computed tomography, and possibly clinicalunder discussion [1] indicates that ALI is seen relatively frequently outcome [7,8]. However, epidemiological data concerningin general wards and can be managed there until death or ALI/ARDS and predefined clinical conditions in terms ofrecovery. In patients with predisposing illnesses directly involving incidence and temporal association are sparse and emergedthe lung, progression to ALI can be rapid. before the consensus definitions were developed. A paper published in this issue of the journal by Ferguson andAcute lung injury (ALI) and its extreme manifestation, the colleagues [1] redresses this imbalance. In a prospectiveacute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) complicate a study conducted over four months in three hospitals in Spain,wide variety of serious medical and surgical conditions, not all the highest incidence of lung injury was identified in patientsof which affect the lung directly [2]. ALI and ARDS are with shock (35.6%) and pneumonia (9.5%). Direct (pul-defined by varying degrees of refractory hypoxemia seen in monary) risk factors were identified in 30% of the cases ofassociation with bilateral lung infiltrates on chest radiography; ALI and ARDS identified, which developed in 6.5% and 4.3%in the absence of left atrial hypertension (thereby excluding of the index population respectively. The onset of lung injuryhydrostatic pulmonary oedema as a cause), but in the was more rapid in those with direct (median 0 days) thanpresence of a clinical condition known to precipitate the indirect (median three days) insults. Mortality was higher insyndrome. Patients can present with either ALI or full-blown those who developed lung injury (ALI 25%, ARDS 22.2%)ARDS, which may have prognostic significance. Some 35% than those who did not (10.3%). More surprisingly mortalityof patients with ALI seem to develop ARDS within three days amongst those with ALI did not differ if they were managedof intensive care unit (ICU) admission [3]. inside or outside the intensive care unit (ICU).Early estimates of the incidence of ARDS varied from 1.5 to How robust are these data and how do they add to our75 cases per 100,000 population – the considerable knowledge? First, the index population was relatively smallvariation being attributable in part to the lack of accepted and (n = 815), of whom only 53 developed ALI; 33 of thesewidely applied defining criteria. However, the introduction of fulfilled the defining criteria for ARDS. Consequently, thethe consensus definitions [2] facilitated the reporting of authors were wise to avoid the temptation of subdividingincidences for ARDS of between 4.8 and 34 per 100,000 patien ...

Tài liệu được xem nhiều:

Tài liệu liên quan: