![Phân tích tư tưởng của nhân dân qua đoạn thơ: Những người vợ nhớ chồng… Những cuộc đời đã hóa sông núi ta trong Đất nước của Nguyễn Khoa Điềm](https://timtailieu.net/upload/document/136415/phan-tich-tu-tuong-cua-nhan-dan-qua-doan-tho-039-039-nhung-nguoi-vo-nho-chong-nhung-cuoc-doi-da-hoa-song-nui-ta-039-039-trong-dat-nuoc-cua-nguyen-khoa-136415.jpg)
Báo cáo y học: DeDefining the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and cough: probabilities, possibilities and limitations
Số trang: 5
Loại file: pdf
Dung lượng: 323.30 KB
Lượt xem: 2
Lượt tải: 0
Xem trước 2 trang đầu tiên của tài liệu này:
Thông tin tài liệu:
Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học Critical Care giúp cho các bạn có thêm kiến thức về ngành y học đề tài: Defining the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and cough: probabilities, possibilities and limitations...
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
Báo cáo y học: "DeDefining the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and cough: probabilities, possibilities and limitations"Cough BioMed Central Open AccessCommentaryDefining the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux andcough: probabilities, possibilities and limitationsMatthew M Eastburn1,2, Peter H Katelaris3 and Anne B Chang*1,4Address: 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Childrens Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, 2School of Information Technology and ElectricalEngineering, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia, 3Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sydney, ConcordHospital, Sydney, Australia and 4Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Northern Territory, AustraliaEmail: Matthew M Eastburn - matt.eastburn@brainlab.com; Peter H Katelaris - pkatelar@mail.usyd.edu.au;Anne B Chang* - annechang@ausdoctors.net* Corresponding authorPublished: 20 March 2007 Received: 30 January 2007 Accepted: 20 March 2007Cough 2007, 3:4 doi:10.1186/1745-9974-3-4This article is available from: http://www.coughjournal.com/content/3/1/4© 2007 Eastburn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract The common co-existence of cough and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is well established. However, ascertaining cause and effect is more difficult for many reasons that include occurrence by chance of two common symptoms, the changing definition of GORD, equipment limitations and the lack of randomised controlled trials. Given these difficulties, it is not surprising that there is disparity of opinion between respiratory and gastroenterology society guidelines on the link between GORD and chronic cough. This commentary explores of these issues. That cough and GORD commonly coexist is indisputableBackgroundThe first guideline on the management of cough champi- in both children [12] and adults [13]. The questions ofoned by Irwin [1] made a significant positive impact. Not whether this is cause and effect [14], whether GORDsurprisingly other guidelines on chronic cough [2-5] have causes cough or vice versa [15] and how commonly cansince been published. American [2], European [3] and the symptom of cough be attributed to GORD remainBritish [5] respiratory guidelines for the management of controversial [9,16]. Nevertheless the problem is real; inchronic unexplained cough in adults advocate empirical the community the burden of cough and GORD, in isola-treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) tion or in combination, is high. Chronic cough is associ-with a variety of medications including proton pump ated with significant morbidity [17] and the economicinhibitors (PPIs). In contrast, guidelines from some cost in terms of medications alone, is billions of dollarsnational gastroenterological societies are less definitive [18]. Empirical acid antisecretory treatment of cough inabout the association between cough and GORD [6-9] adults adds to this cost. In Australia alone, where the costsPaediatric cough guidelines do not favour the empirical of medications are heavily subsided by the government,approach in adults because GORD as a cause of isolated three PPIs are in the top 10 drugs by cost [19]. In 2006cough is rare in children [10,11]. Is there evidence for a these 3 PPIs alone costs the Australian tax payers almosttrue difference or do these differences exist because opin- A$42.5 million [19].ion leaders in their respective fields have different views?In this commentary, important limitations in understand-ing the association between cough and GORD areexplored. ...
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
Báo cáo y học: "DeDefining the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and cough: probabilities, possibilities and limitations"Cough BioMed Central Open AccessCommentaryDefining the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux andcough: probabilities, possibilities and limitationsMatthew M Eastburn1,2, Peter H Katelaris3 and Anne B Chang*1,4Address: 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Childrens Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, 2School of Information Technology and ElectricalEngineering, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia, 3Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sydney, ConcordHospital, Sydney, Australia and 4Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Northern Territory, AustraliaEmail: Matthew M Eastburn - matt.eastburn@brainlab.com; Peter H Katelaris - pkatelar@mail.usyd.edu.au;Anne B Chang* - annechang@ausdoctors.net* Corresponding authorPublished: 20 March 2007 Received: 30 January 2007 Accepted: 20 March 2007Cough 2007, 3:4 doi:10.1186/1745-9974-3-4This article is available from: http://www.coughjournal.com/content/3/1/4© 2007 Eastburn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract The common co-existence of cough and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is well established. However, ascertaining cause and effect is more difficult for many reasons that include occurrence by chance of two common symptoms, the changing definition of GORD, equipment limitations and the lack of randomised controlled trials. Given these difficulties, it is not surprising that there is disparity of opinion between respiratory and gastroenterology society guidelines on the link between GORD and chronic cough. This commentary explores of these issues. That cough and GORD commonly coexist is indisputableBackgroundThe first guideline on the management of cough champi- in both children [12] and adults [13]. The questions ofoned by Irwin [1] made a significant positive impact. Not whether this is cause and effect [14], whether GORDsurprisingly other guidelines on chronic cough [2-5] have causes cough or vice versa [15] and how commonly cansince been published. American [2], European [3] and the symptom of cough be attributed to GORD remainBritish [5] respiratory guidelines for the management of controversial [9,16]. Nevertheless the problem is real; inchronic unexplained cough in adults advocate empirical the community the burden of cough and GORD, in isola-treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) tion or in combination, is high. Chronic cough is associ-with a variety of medications including proton pump ated with significant morbidity [17] and the economicinhibitors (PPIs). In contrast, guidelines from some cost in terms of medications alone, is billions of dollarsnational gastroenterological societies are less definitive [18]. Empirical acid antisecretory treatment of cough inabout the association between cough and GORD [6-9] adults adds to this cost. In Australia alone, where the costsPaediatric cough guidelines do not favour the empirical of medications are heavily subsided by the government,approach in adults because GORD as a cause of isolated three PPIs are in the top 10 drugs by cost [19]. In 2006cough is rare in children [10,11]. Is there evidence for a these 3 PPIs alone costs the Australian tax payers almosttrue difference or do these differences exist because opin- A$42.5 million [19].ion leaders in their respective fields have different views?In this commentary, important limitations in understand-ing the association between cough and GORD areexplored. ...
Tìm kiếm theo từ khóa liên quan:
trình bày báo cáo tài liệu báo cáo khoa học báo cáo y học nghiên cứu y học kiến thức y họcTài liệu liên quan:
-
Tổng quan hệ thống về lao thanh quản
6 trang 321 0 0 -
5 trang 319 0 0
-
Hướng dẫn trình bày báo cáo thực tập chuyên ngành
14 trang 302 0 0 -
8 trang 273 1 0
-
Tổng quan hệ thống hiệu quả kiểm soát sâu răng của Silver Diamine Fluoride
6 trang 266 0 0 -
Vai trò tiên lượng của C-reactive protein trong nhồi máu não
7 trang 253 0 0 -
Khảo sát hài lòng người bệnh nội trú tại Bệnh viện Nhi Đồng 1
9 trang 238 0 0 -
13 trang 221 0 0
-
Tình trạng viêm lợi ở trẻ em học đường Việt Nam sau hai thập niên có chương trình nha học đường
4 trang 217 0 0 -
5 trang 216 0 0