Danh mục

Báo cáo y học: Does serum procalcitonin have a diagnostic value in febrile adult patients presenting to the emergency department

Số trang: 2      Loại file: pdf      Dung lượng: 39.27 KB      Lượt xem: 3      Lượt tải: 0    
Thư Viện Số

Hỗ trợ phí lưu trữ khi tải xuống: 1,000 VND Tải xuống file đầy đủ (2 trang) 0

Báo xấu

Xem trước 2 trang đầu tiên của tài liệu này:

Thông tin tài liệu:

Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học Critical Care giúp cho các bạn có thêm kiến thức về ngành y học đề tài: Does serum procalcitonin have a diagnostic value in febrile adult patients presenting to the emergency department?
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
Báo cáo y học: "Does serum procalcitonin have a diagnostic value in febrile adult patients presenting to the emergency department" Available online http://ccforum.com/content/11/6/422LetterDoes serum procalcitonin have a diagnostic value in febrile adultpatients presenting to the emergency department?Jos AH van Oers1, Jaap E Tulleken2 and Jan G Zijlstra21Department of Intensive Care, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands2Department of Intensive and Respiratory Care, University Medical Center, Groningen, The NetherlandsCorresponding author: Jos AH van Oers, E-mail: jahvanoers@hetnet.nlPublished: 14 November 2007 Critical Care 2007, 11:422 (doi:10.1186/cc6172)This article is online at http://ccforum.com/content/11/6/422© 2007 BioMed Central LtdSee related research by Hausfater et al., http://ccforum.com/content/11/5/R60Hausfater and colleagues stated that in febrile adult patients emergency physician is based on anamnesis, physicalpresenting to the emergency department (ED) a procalcitonin examination and traditional markers such as neutrophil(PCT) ≥ 0.2 mcg/l can help physicians to identify leukocytes and C-reactive protein (CRP). For example, CRP ≥ 40 mg/l, LR+ 2.0, LR- 0.39. Pre-test probability changed bybacterial/parasitic infections [1]. We disagree and want to CRP ≥ 40 mg/l to 82% and to 47% by CRP < 40. Will theillustrate that by calculating likelihood ratios (LR). A LR is asemi-quantitative measure of the performance of a diagnostic likelihood ratios of the emergency physician change muchtest, expressing the magnitude by which the pre-test when PCT is added to the spectrum of available diagnosticprobability of a diagnosis in a given patient is modified by the tests? We don’t think so.results of a test [2]. A positive result with a high positive Competing interestslikelihood ratio (LR+) can rule in a diagnosis. A negativeresult with a low negative likelihood ratio (LR-) can rule out a The authors declare that they have no competing interests.diagnosis. LR+ for the emergency physician 1.98, LR- 0.26. ReferencesUsing prevalence of bacterial/parasitic infections as pre-test 1. Hausfater P, Juillien G, Madonna-Py B, Haroche J, Bernard M,probability, a positive diagnosis by the physician modified Riou B: Serum procalcitonin measurement as diagnostic andpre-test probability from 69% to 82% and a negative prognostic marker in febrile patients presenting to the emer-diagnosis to 37%. PCT ≥ 0.2 mcg/l, LR+ 1.88 and LR- 0.39. gency department. Crit Care 2007, 11:R60. 2. Halkin A, Reichman J, Schwaber M, Paltiel O, Brezis M: Likeli-Pre-test probability changed to 81% by PCT ≥ 0.2 mcg/l and hood ratios: getting diagnostic testing into perspective. QJMto 47% by PCT < 0.2 mcg/l. The performance of the 1998, 91(4):247-258.Authors’ responsePierre Hausfater and Bruno RiouWe thank van Oers and colleagues for their comments. We important [3]. In contrast, the receiver operating curve (ROC)agree that likelihood ratios (LR) are useful tests in provides a global assessment of diagnostic accuracy withoutinterpretation of clinical findings, laboratory tests, and image any focus on a given threshold. Second, we do not think thatstudies, although they are little used [1]. However, we do not the LR of PCT should be applied to the global populationthink that LR is the unique response to a complex issue. First, tested and compared to that of the emergency physician.LR is provided for a given predetermined threshold and we Actually, the best way to use LR should have been to identifyare convinced that the threshold of procalcitonin (PCT) highly the real pretest probability by collecting more accurately thedepends on the population tested and the type of infection diagnostic suspicion of the emergency physician, and to teststudied. Moreover, we recently observed that this threshold is the LR of PCT in the different subgroups (low, intermediate,markedly modified by renal function [2]. It should also be and high pretest probability of bacterial infection).pointed out that the threshold is usually provided without Unfortunately, we did not assess that in our study. It is likelyconfidence interval whereas this information might be very that PCT may be particularly useful in patients with anCRP = C-reactive protein; ED = emergency department; LR = likelihood ratio; PCT = procalcitonin; ROC = receiver operating curve. Page 1 of 2 (page number not for citation purposes)Critical Care Vol 11 No 6 van Oers et al.intermediate pretest probability a ...

Tài liệu được xem nhiều:

Tài liệu liên quan: