![Phân tích tư tưởng của nhân dân qua đoạn thơ: Những người vợ nhớ chồng… Những cuộc đời đã hóa sông núi ta trong Đất nước của Nguyễn Khoa Điềm](https://timtailieu.net/upload/document/136415/phan-tich-tu-tuong-cua-nhan-dan-qua-doan-tho-039-039-nhung-nguoi-vo-nho-chong-nhung-cuoc-doi-da-hoa-song-nui-ta-039-039-trong-dat-nuoc-cua-nguyen-khoa-136415.jpg)
Báo cáo y học: Modeling longitudinal data in acute illness
Số trang: 2
Loại file: pdf
Dung lượng: 35.93 KB
Lượt xem: 5
Lượt tải: 0
Xem trước 2 trang đầu tiên của tài liệu này:
Thông tin tài liệu:
Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về y học được đăng trên tạp chí y học Critical Care giúp cho các bạn có thêm kiến thức về ngành y học đề tài: Modeling longitudinal data in acute illness...
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
Báo cáo y học: "Modeling longitudinal data in acute illness" Available online http://ccforum.com/content/11/4/152CommentaryModeling longitudinal data in acute illnessGilles ClermontCIRM (Center for Inflammation and Regenerative Modeling), Clinical Research, Investigation and Systems Modeling in Acute Illness (CRISMA)laboratory, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Terrace St, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia 15261, USACorresponding author: Gilles Clermont, clermontg@upmc.eduPublished: 2 August 2007 Critical Care 2007, 11:152 (doi:10.1186/cc5968)This article is online at http://ccforum.com/content/11/4/152© 2007 BioMed Central LtdSee related research by Kyr et al., http://ccforum.com/content/11/3/R70Abstract authors recognize their work to be exploratory, and limited by the small size of the cohort, lack of a validation group, andBiomarkers of sepsis could allow early identification of high-risk inability to include predictors in the models that couldpatients, in whom aggressive interventions can be life-saving. significantly enhance the applicability of the predictions toAmong those interventions are the immunomodulatory therapies,which will hopefully become increasingly available to clinicians. more refined subgroups or individual patients. However, theHowever, optimal use of such interventions will probably be patient work is relevant to critical illness.specific and based on longitudinal profiles of such biomarkers.Modeling techniques that allow proper interpretation and The critical care community’s best effort to address sepsis isclassification of these longitudinal profiles, as they relate to patient crystallized in the recommendations of the Surviving Sepsischaracteristics, disease progression, and therapeutic interventions, campaign [2]. Despite conflicting reports on the efficacy ofwill prove essential to the development of such individualizedinterventions. Once validated, these models may also prove useful immunomodulation in sepsis, there is a prevailing view thatin the rational design of future clinical trials and in the interpretation future, decisive improvement in outcomes will result fromof their results. However, only a minority of mathematicians and targeted, biomarker-guided immunomodulation [3,4]. However,statisticians are familiar with these newer techniques, which have how the targeting should be achieved and how biomarkerundergone remarkable development during the past two decades. profiles should be interpreted remain open fields of inquiry. InInterestingly, critical illness has the potential to become a keytesting ground and field of application for these emerging modeling this regard, the development of data-driven models thattechniques, given the increasing availability of point-of-care testing ‘explain’ the dynamics of markers of septic physiology mayand the need for titrated interventions in this patient population. prove useful.Critical care physicians titrate care of individual patients There are, however, two caveats. First, in view of observedbased on presumed diagnosis derived from available data variability between patients, how confident can one be whenand anticipated progression of disease. The problem of ascribing an individual patient to a specific disease subgroup,sepsis in the intensive care unit has proven particularly vexing and how soon during the course of disease can this bebecause both components of the decision-making process accomplished? Such knowledge could help in selecting aare insufficiently characterized. The problem is compounded therapeutic strategy that is most appropriate for the particularby the fact that interventions in severely septic patients are disease subgroup. The second caveat pertains to thetime critical, the data are complex, and there is at least ...
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
Báo cáo y học: "Modeling longitudinal data in acute illness" Available online http://ccforum.com/content/11/4/152CommentaryModeling longitudinal data in acute illnessGilles ClermontCIRM (Center for Inflammation and Regenerative Modeling), Clinical Research, Investigation and Systems Modeling in Acute Illness (CRISMA)laboratory, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Terrace St, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia 15261, USACorresponding author: Gilles Clermont, clermontg@upmc.eduPublished: 2 August 2007 Critical Care 2007, 11:152 (doi:10.1186/cc5968)This article is online at http://ccforum.com/content/11/4/152© 2007 BioMed Central LtdSee related research by Kyr et al., http://ccforum.com/content/11/3/R70Abstract authors recognize their work to be exploratory, and limited by the small size of the cohort, lack of a validation group, andBiomarkers of sepsis could allow early identification of high-risk inability to include predictors in the models that couldpatients, in whom aggressive interventions can be life-saving. significantly enhance the applicability of the predictions toAmong those interventions are the immunomodulatory therapies,which will hopefully become increasingly available to clinicians. more refined subgroups or individual patients. However, theHowever, optimal use of such interventions will probably be patient work is relevant to critical illness.specific and based on longitudinal profiles of such biomarkers.Modeling techniques that allow proper interpretation and The critical care community’s best effort to address sepsis isclassification of these longitudinal profiles, as they relate to patient crystallized in the recommendations of the Surviving Sepsischaracteristics, disease progression, and therapeutic interventions, campaign [2]. Despite conflicting reports on the efficacy ofwill prove essential to the development of such individualizedinterventions. Once validated, these models may also prove useful immunomodulation in sepsis, there is a prevailing view thatin the rational design of future clinical trials and in the interpretation future, decisive improvement in outcomes will result fromof their results. However, only a minority of mathematicians and targeted, biomarker-guided immunomodulation [3,4]. However,statisticians are familiar with these newer techniques, which have how the targeting should be achieved and how biomarkerundergone remarkable development during the past two decades. profiles should be interpreted remain open fields of inquiry. InInterestingly, critical illness has the potential to become a keytesting ground and field of application for these emerging modeling this regard, the development of data-driven models thattechniques, given the increasing availability of point-of-care testing ‘explain’ the dynamics of markers of septic physiology mayand the need for titrated interventions in this patient population. prove useful.Critical care physicians titrate care of individual patients There are, however, two caveats. First, in view of observedbased on presumed diagnosis derived from available data variability between patients, how confident can one be whenand anticipated progression of disease. The problem of ascribing an individual patient to a specific disease subgroup,sepsis in the intensive care unit has proven particularly vexing and how soon during the course of disease can this bebecause both components of the decision-making process accomplished? Such knowledge could help in selecting aare insufficiently characterized. The problem is compounded therapeutic strategy that is most appropriate for the particularby the fact that interventions in severely septic patients are disease subgroup. The second caveat pertains to thetime critical, the data are complex, and there is at least ...
Tìm kiếm theo từ khóa liên quan:
trình bày báo cáo tài liệu báo cáo khoa học báo cáo y học nghiên cứu y học kiến thức y họcTài liệu liên quan:
-
Tổng quan hệ thống về lao thanh quản
6 trang 321 0 0 -
5 trang 319 0 0
-
Hướng dẫn trình bày báo cáo thực tập chuyên ngành
14 trang 302 0 0 -
8 trang 273 1 0
-
Tổng quan hệ thống hiệu quả kiểm soát sâu răng của Silver Diamine Fluoride
6 trang 266 0 0 -
Vai trò tiên lượng của C-reactive protein trong nhồi máu não
7 trang 253 0 0 -
Khảo sát hài lòng người bệnh nội trú tại Bệnh viện Nhi Đồng 1
9 trang 238 0 0 -
13 trang 221 0 0
-
Tình trạng viêm lợi ở trẻ em học đường Việt Nam sau hai thập niên có chương trình nha học đường
4 trang 217 0 0 -
5 trang 216 0 0